On 7/7/2011 6:06 PM, Blake Bowers wrote:
> It would not affect your FAA, just local planning/zoning/codes.
It might, depending on the height and if they become the top antenna. It
could require the addition on lights.
> Dealing with the FAA in my experience has been very easy, unlike most
> federal agencies.
I know a number of pilots who might disagree there including one famous
air show pilot, but in over 20 years I've had no problem with them.
Never been ramp checked either, but there's a first time for everything.
73
Roger (K8RI)
> Don't take your organs to heaven,
> heaven knows we need them down here!
> Be an organ donor, sign your donor card today.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Neil& Heather"<neil.goodell@myfairpoint.net>
> To: "Blake Bowers"<bbowers@mozarks.com>
> Cc:<TOWERTALK@contesting.com>
> Sent: Thursday, July 07, 2011 4:23 PM
> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Tower Leasing
>
>
>> On 7/7/2011 4:29 PM, Blake Bowers wrote:
>>
>>> 8. Having a rentor changes your tower in the eyes of zoning and codes.
>> That in my eyes is the kicker.... I have already jumped thru hoops
>> once,
>> and have filed with the FAA because I am 5000' from center of
>> the runway at the local Airport.
>> The Town and the local Building Inspector were easy to deal with
>> once I had FAA Fly-over assessment and approval and paperwork...
>> I would just as well not stir anything up,
>> or bring any un-needed attention to my tower site..
>> Thanks for all the responses,
>> and Thank you Pete on the tip about the archives,
>> looks like I have some research to do...
>>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________
_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
|