Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter dipole

To: "towertalk@contesting.com" <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] 80 meter dipole
From: Al Kozakiewicz <akozak@hourglass.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2014 13:37:14 +0000
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
FWIW, I have an 80m dipole in an inverted Vee configuration with the apex at 
the top of the gable end of a one story section of my house, perhaps 18 feet,  
and the ends about 4 - 6 feet off the ground.  It's only used for the SS phone 
contest; with 1500 watts, it does a decent job on QSOs in the eastern US where 
I live.

At any rate, I consider that antenna to be damn low - maybe/almost NVIS - for 
80m.  Regardless, there is a pronounced 2:1 SWR curve with a bandwidth of no 
more than 150 kHz.  So yeah, the wide bandwidth sounds really suspicious.

Al
AB2ZY
________________________________________
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom Osborne <w7why@frontier.com>
To: Hans Hammarquist <hanslg@aol.com>
Sent: Mon, Jul 21, 2014 12:32 pm
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Fwd:  80 meter dipole


HI Hans

It usually works pretty well.  During the WRTC contest last week, I was
able to work a bunch of them with this antenna.  It just puzzles me why
the SWR bandwitch is so wide.  Shouldn't be that way.  73
Tom W7WHY


On 7/21/2014 3:48 AM, Hans Hammarquist via TowerTalk wrote:
> Do you only find very weak signals? If not, try it. I found several parallel
wires to widen the bandwidth. Wound myself a helix once for 10 meter and managed
to make it cover the entire 10 meter.
>
>
> Hans - N2JFS



_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>