To: | "john@kk9a.com" <john@kk9a.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TowerTalk] Top Bearing Plate for 55G vs Rotor Plate |
From: | Charlie Gallo <Charlie@TheGallos.com> |
Reply-to: | Charlie Gallo <Charlie@TheGallos.com> |
Date: | Tue, 12 Aug 2014 13:02:33 -0400 |
List-post: | <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com> |
On 8/12/2014 john@kk9a.com wrote: > I concur. There is no reason for three bearings along the mast. > John KK9A In fact, I'll go further - there are reasons NOT to have three bearings along a mast, the main one being that unless the mast is perfectly straight, and you have perfectly lined up the bearings, you WILL get binding, unless it is a bearing with play in the mounts, and then why have it in that situaution Remember 2 points determine a line, 3 points a plane. I see people make over constrained designs all the time, and they only lead to problems -- Charlie www.baysidephoto.com www.thegallos.com _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ TowerTalk mailing list TowerTalk@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: Top Bearing Plate for 55G vs Rotor Plate, Gary Jones |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: Top Bearing Plate for 55G vs Rotor Plate, Don |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TowerTalk] Top Bearing Plate for 55G vs Rotor Plate, john@kk9a.com |
Next by Thread: | [TowerTalk] Top Bearing Plate for 55G vs Rotor Plate (vs modified Beacon Plate_, Kirby Hallenbeck |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |