Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Matching network for wire antenna needed

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Matching network for wire antenna needed
From: Jim Lux <jimlux@earthlink.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2014 16:01:03 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On 9/14/14, 2:47 PM, Doug Smith wrote:
You can match both 160 and 80 with a single “modified” L-Network.  It would 
have three components rather than just two.  There would be no switching required moving from 
160 to 80.

But, you’d likely need TWO of these networks — one for the bottom end of the 
bands and one for the top end of the bands.  With remote switching to flip between them.


Theoretically, one can design a network with a sufficient number Ls and Cs to get good match anywhere. It's not quite as simple as two narrow band networks with a switch, but it will be the same number of total components.

There's a fair amount of literature in IEEE Trans on Ant and Prop from the 60s and similar journals with the equations and design principles. Look for "broadband matching network". I seem to recall seeing papers about techniques to match the whole HF band into a dual resonance whip antenna without relying on a big amplifier and loss.


One has to watch out for pathological scenarios with a lot of loss, but these days, with computers to do the model, it's fairly straightforward to do the optimization.


_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>