Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: G5RV vs 40M dipole

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] [Bulk] Re: G5RV vs 40M dipole
From: Jim Brown <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Reply-to: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 14:09:12 -0700
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
On Sun,4/26/2015 9:22 AM, Grant Saviers wrote:
OTOH two 80/40/20 fan dipoles (at right angles) I modeled and built worked super at 65' high. They worked on 15m with a tuner (<2.5:1 swr) and perhaps on 10m if the coax is cut for a match or there is enough loss. I separated the ends by 24" using 3/8 sq pvc rod which makes for mechanical complexity and difficulty winding it up (I use 10" diameter concrete column forms).

I use similar construction, with separation of 8-9 inches between wires. I've never tried to put more than three resonant dipoles on the same feedpoint.

Someone stated that fan dipoles are a compromise antenna. That's fundamentally false -- all elements of the fan produce the same field strength as a single dipole at the same mounting location. The ONLY compromise is that the higher frequency bands have reduced SWR bandwidth as compared to a single antenna. Since the bandwidth of 2M is only 2.5%, that's not a problem with a 40/30/20 fan. It can be if 10M is the highest band -- I remember getting about SWR under 2:1 from 28 to about 28.7 from my 20/15/10 fans.

Eznec models are reasonably accurate if you follow the recommendations on modeling by Cebik, #108-111 at http://www.antennex.com/w4rnl/

re VE7RF's conjecture that the center of every dipole may not need to be connected: Since I had a working EZNEC model, I disconnected the transmission line connections to the 40 and 20m dipoles and fed only the 80m. There is coupling but very poor swr; 4:1 on 40m, 10:1 on 20m, 8:1 on 15m, so it's not a good idea.

After studying the chapters in N6BT's book that described this technique, I spent time trying to model it, with only limited success. As I recall, I could get good coupling (both match and radiation efficiency) with two bands (one directly driven, one parasitically coupled), I didn't get a third band working. It seems intuitively obvious that while the technique is elegant and the performance of Tom's antennas prove that it works, the design is NOT trivial. :)

73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>