Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

[TowerTalk] Tuning vertical SWR-Analyzer vs SWR bridge

To: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: [TowerTalk] Tuning vertical SWR-Analyzer vs SWR bridge
From: Phillip Zminda <phil-z@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 18:31:39 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I installed a 6-BTV vertical about a year ago. It is ground-mounted with about 
60 radials and fed with Bury-Flex coax. I felt that the SWR was where I needed 
it. Over the winterI saw a shift in the SWR to the high end of most bands. I 
suspected that some clamp loosened and a dimension changed. I started to 
re-check dimensions and checked all my coax connections and did not see any 
problems. I began to suspect a trap leaked or got out of adjustment. As I began 
to try re-tuning I found that when I checked SWR with my AIM-4170 analyzer or 
an MFJ-259B the SWR showed a the dip at a much higher frequency than I see with 
the SWR meter in my radio (tuner bypassed), a K-3, or on an external SWR 
bridge. I have to assume the radio should be the preferred tool since the rig 
will fold-back if it doesn’t like the SWR. I have tried calibrating the AIM 
with standards at the end of the coax and have also used a new run of coax.

My real concern is the lack of consistency between the analyzers, which are 
close in readings and the SWR meter at the radio. I have been using my Argonaut 
VI and a separate coax to tune but still having difficulty seeing the low point 
on several bands. I am looking for ideas of what can cause such a discrepancy 
between the analyzers and RF from the radios (typically 5 watts). Any 
suggestions appreciated.

Thanks,

Phil N3ZP
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>