Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Radial Question

To: Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Radial Question
From: Chuck Dietz <w5prchuck@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 14:22:17 -0600
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
That's the way I do it, but use radials 180 degrees apart. (I only use two
elevated radials and gamma feed the grounded tower.

Chuck W5PR

On Saturday, February 27, 2016, Robert Harmon <k6uj@pacbell.net> wrote:

> I use four elevated radials for 80m.  What I did was hook up my analyzer
> to each pair, 90 degrees from one another,  without connecting anything
> else tune for resonance (just like a dipole, which it essentially is)  Then
> connect them all together to the vertical antenna feedpoint coax
> connection.  This worked very well, do I have equal currents in each radial
> with this approach ?
>
> Bob
> K6UJ
>
> On 2/27/16 9:32 AM, Dennis W0JX via TowerTalk wrote:
>
>> The effect of the earth on the radial generally is to detune it and make
>> it longer electrically than it is. Perhaps Frank W3LPL can add something
>> here as to why he recommends 70 feet.
>> As for elevated radials. many studies have concluded, going back as far
>> as Les Moxon, that quarter-wave elevated radials are about the worst
>> possible length you can make them. This particular length makes it very
>> difficult to obtain equal currents in each radial. Dick Weber, K5IU, wrote
>> an excellent article on this topic, stating that ideal lengths are 60
>> degrees (or about 2/3rds of a quarter wavelength) loaded by a single small
>> coil, or 120 degrees (about 4/3rds of a quarter wavelength) tuned by a
>> variable capacitor, are ideal lengths. Of course, a multi-band vertical
>> complicates matters and would require a loading coil for each band.
>> 73, Dennis W0JX
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TowerTalk mailing list
>> TowerTalk@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>