Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] One of our own...

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] One of our own...
From: "Jim Hargrave" <w5ifp@gvtc.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 07:52:36 -0500
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Be nice....This is a hobby!

Where were you back in the  1950s when I worked 40M AM with a
surplus ART-13 connected to the double bed springs and grounded to
the bathroom water pipe?. I learned early on: Don't touch the carbon
mic with my lips!

We engineered by the "seat of our pants". If it worked we were
elated, if not, we tried something else.

Now - where is that DELETE key???

73, Jim - w5ifp@gvtc.com

>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On
>> Behalf Of David Gilbert
>> Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2016 2:32 AM
>> To: towertalk@contesting.com
>> Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] One of our own...
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Mine as well.  I'm just plain tired of old wives tales and
unfounded
>> claims cluttering up our hobby.  This is nominally supposed to be
a
>> technology-based pursuit and we have tools to help us understand
>> what's
>> going on.   Willfully ignoring them to make absolute claims ("a
loop is
>> always better than a dipole"???) based upon uncontrolled
>> anecdotal evidence sets the hobby back.
>> 
>> Dave   AB7E
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 5/25/2016 9:31 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
>> > On Wed,5/25/2016 9:08 PM, Bob K6UJ wrote:
>> >> But I thought it wasn't necessary for him to be so
condescending
>> to
>> >> make his point.
>> >
>> > Well, I get really tired of "don't bother me with theory, my
>> anecdotal
>> > experience trumps physics that is clearly understood by those
>> who take
>> > the time to study it."
>> >
>> > I guess that's my problem. :)
>> >
>> > 73, Jim K9YC

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>