Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN

To: <charlie@thegallos.com>, <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN
From: "Hardy Landskov" <n7rt@cox.net>
Date: Sat, 3 Sep 2016 20:03:48 -0400
List-post: <towertalk@contesting.com">mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I have used LDF4-50A & LMR400 for years. No more RG213 except for short
jumpers.
I bought a lot of this many years ago and it still tests good.
Just my results. Pay for the good stuff once!
73 Hardy N7RT/4


-----Original Message-----
From: TowerTalk [mailto:towertalk-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
charlie@thegallos.com
Sent: Saturday, September 03, 2016 3:35 PM
To: jim@audiosystemsgroup.com
Cc: towertalk@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] LMR600 male DIN

> On Sat,9/3/2016 9:50 AM, john@kk9a.com wrote:
>> I would not use LMR600 for the runs to the tower.
>
> Also, always consider loss vs frequency when deciding how much to 
> spend on coax (or hard line) for a given run.<snip>

I'm running burryflex (150 ft run) for 80-10 (no 160 here), with the last
30 ft of the 80 being "in the air" to the dipole

I _SERIOUSLY_ considered heliax, but NOT for signal.  Look at expected life
span out in the elements.  I was, and am, hoping it is a "once and done"
thing (darn rotor has failed, replacement is here - just need to have
someone climb - I can't)

I looked at the lifetime ratings of the small heliax/hardline, and said "You
know, that might be the way to go.."

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>