Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] PST61 Rotor Reliability?

To: <towertalk@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] PST61 Rotor Reliability?
From: <john@kk9a.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 20:16:26 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
I am not following how moving one antenna ~6" sideways makes a significant
different in rotational torque.

John KK9A


To:     xdavid@cis-broadband.com, towertalk@contesting.com
Subject:        Re: [TowerTalk] PST61 Rotor Reliability?
From:   k7lxc--- via TowerTalk <towertalk@contesting.com>
Reply-to:       k7lxc@aol.com
Date:   Sun, 10 Dec 2017 13:36:16 -0500

>  The problem is that in the springtime when it gets really windy here, 
the high ridge line to the west and south of me blocks those prevailing 
winds and turns them into swirling wind gusts that AVERAGE anywhere from 
50 mph to 80 mph about every three to five minutes ... with peaks 
sometimes reaching 90 mph on a bad day. When those swirlers hit the 
tower head on, the forces on each end of the boom don't balance ... they 
add.? The resultant torque on the mast must be tremendous, and in any 
case it eventually managed to strip the gears in the NE position.?    If the

antennas are mounted on the same side of the mast - yes, the additive torque
is 
significant. My advice is to mount the antennas on opposite sides of the
mast. 
That way, much of the torque is cancelled out. Dick Weber pointed this out
in a 
QEX article years ago. That should have positive effects on your rotator as 
well.Cheers,Steve    K7LXCTOWER TECH

_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>