Towertalk
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TowerTalk] Looking for tower advice

To: sawyered@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: [TowerTalk] Looking for tower advice
From: Mickey Baker <fishflorida@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 10:37:44 -0500
List-post: <mailto:towertalk@contesting.com>
Simply be prepared with an argument for your selected height for effective
communication.

This is the commonly used paper: https://www.arrl.org/files/file/antplnr.pdf

Mickey Baker, N4MB
Palm Beach Gardens, FL
*“The servant-leader is servant first… It begins with the natural feeling
that one wants to serve, to serve first. Then conscious choice brings one
to aspire to lead." Robert K. Greenleaf*


On Tue, Mar 9, 2021 at 6:20 AM <sawyered@earthlink.net> wrote:

> I am not sure that it matters but you should be aware that f the city
> zoning
> code actually says "amateur towers are limited to 40ft" then it is an
> unenforceable statute since it is preempted by Federal PRB1.  An arbitrary
> height restriction that does not try to accommodate the federally licensed
> amateur's communication needs is not enforceable.  So if you did happen to
> want a self supporting 50ft tower, go for it.
>
>
>
> Ed  N1UR
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TowerTalk mailing list
> TowerTalk@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
>
_______________________________________________



_______________________________________________
TowerTalk mailing list
TowerTalk@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/towertalk
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>