[Amps] Clean -vs- Unclean

[Carcia, Francis A HS]

That's why we have the ARRL to sort this out for the masses.  

-----Original Message-----
From: amps-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces at contesting.com] On
Behalf Of R.Measures
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 12:32 PM
To: Gudguyham at aol.com
Cc: amps at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [Amps] Clean -vs- Unclean


On Jan 9, 2006, at 8:23 AM, Gudguyham at aol.com wrote:

>
> In a message dated 1/9/2006 11:22:07 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> g8gsq at eltac.co.uk writes:
>
> Depends  on the amplifier type and design, but the most significant
> factor is  usually the rf device and how hard it's run. On tube
> amplifiers, operator  adjustment is likely to dominate over everything 
>  else.
>
When compared with the average radio, even a 3-500Z has about a tenth 
the total IMD.
>
>
>
> I will second that!
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>

Richard L. Measures, AG6K, 805.386.3734.  www.somis.org

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps