[Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW

Dave M slash_dot at msn.com
Tue Nov 9 15:36:54 PST 2010


And yet another consideration would be to create a new class of operation , perhaps based on ERP , call it "Elite Class" or something similar , most of the world class contest stations would scramble to qualify for it and they would be left to compete among them selves leaving us "Lower Class" stations to compete on even ground  




......................................................................................................
 
73     VE3DV , Dave



 

> From: powell.john at xtra.co.nz
> To: amps at contesting.com
> Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:05:18 +1300
> Subject: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW
> 
> Would not the power output indication be considered 2.5 KW PEP ?. If so does the power level meet the 1.5 KW maximum ?. I could only see the 2.5 KW level being achieved on voice peaks, not a continuous carrier.
> Just a thought.
> Some years ago I was participating in a contest ( I can't remember precisely which one) and was persistently hounded by a very strong signal from a UA station while trying to complete an exchange with another station.. When in QSO with the offending station gave him an exchange of 229 73. Later received a QSL from the UA and returned it "Not In Log". Got a letter from him complaining that this couldn't be the case he was operating from a Military setup running 10 KW with a Rhombic antenna. Food for thought ?.
> 
> 73
> John. ZL1BHQ
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
 		 	   		  


More information about the Amps mailing list