[Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW

Carl km1h at jeremy.mv.com
Tue Nov 9 16:53:00 PST 2010


Better still, a crybaby award for whoever got that silly rule rammed thru.

Carl
KM1H


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Katz" <stevek at jmr.com>
To: "Dave M" <slash_dot at msn.com>; <amps at contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 6:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW


> Why not just establish an "illegal power" class?
> 
> -WB2WIK
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: amps-bounces at contesting.com [mailto:amps-bounces at contesting.com]
> On Behalf Of Dave M
> Sent: Tuesday, November 09, 2010 3:37 PM
> To: amps at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [Amps] our amplifier in 2010 CQWW
> 
> 
> And yet another consideration would be to create a new class of
> operation , perhaps based on ERP , call it "Elite Class" or something
> similar , most of the world class contest stations would scramble to
> qualify for it and they would be left to compete among them selves
> leaving us "Lower Class" stations to compete on even ground  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps


More information about the Amps mailing list