[Amps] GIVE IT A BREAK! (Subject change from:Commander HF-1250 problem)

[mgb]

There are some very smart and experienced folks that hang around this reflector, which is the reason I take time to sort through all the B/S to get to the jewels of wisdom.  

That said, no one likes to be lectured to, or made to look like a fool, especially in public.  When someone pushes that particular button, the result is usually a public FLAME ON response, and I get that.  It's probably safe to say that it has happened to most folks, or they have seen it done to others with their own eyes.  It is a natural response when someone sticks a finger in your chest to just jump up and beat the be-jezus out of that particular idiot (either physically or verbally). Just be aware that some folks actually TRY to get that kind of reaction from others and get off on it!  

So a polite request please... try as best you can to ignore the temptation to go public with the flame-on response and instead go to private email and have at it.  

This a TECHNICAL forum and not an ego contest arena where snide comments are made about the technical ability of hams in some other country, or the legality of some kind of amplifier or emission type, or WHATEVER ELSE! 

And since I am on a roll, please also try to limit the EGO CONTESTS that are really out of control from several posters here.  Please don't give education at the price of sarcasm. 

This is already too long of a response.  My bad.  Later.

Mark Bitterlich 
WA3JPY

      

----- Original Message -----
From: "Carl" <km1h at jeremy.mv.com>
To: "Bill Turner" <dezrat1242 at yahoo.com>, "Amps" <amps at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, November 20, 2013 12:05:49 PM
Subject: Re: [Amps] Commander HF-1250 problem

> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:          (may be snipped)
>
> On Tue, 19 Nov 2013 21:04:54 -0500, you wrote:
>
>>
>>You trying to play Freddie Flatfoot again Bill? No surprise there.
>>
>>Where did I say it was used on a ham band or CB for that matter? The 
>>wording
>>was specifically meant to get a clueless PITA mouthing off.
>>
>>If you dont know what Im involved with you should keep your flap shut.
>>
>>Carl
>>KM1H
>
> REPLY:
>
> Gee Carl, I worry about you.

** No need to as I have qualified people and a loving family plus girlfriend 
to do that.


> You have demonstrated your cluelessness about technical subjects over and
> over on this reflector, so I thought you had screwed up again. Glad to see
> you hadn't.  I remember your famous gaffe about PIV ratings in a bridge
> rectifier. It took a number of us to finally get you straightened out, but
> we were glad to help.

** Hmm, that discussion was more of a difference of opinion between adequate 
and very conservative number of diodes if I remember.
OTOH, Ive never claimed to be perfect and defer that to you and JI.  Ive 
owned up to my share of errors.


>
> Still waiting for you to document your statement that the coil in a VHF
> parasitic suppressor MUST be self-resonant at the parasitic frequency. You
> seem to be the only one to have made such a statement. Can you cite your
> source(s) please?


** First of all I doubt if I said the coil MUST be resonant at the EXACT 
parasitic frequency and secondly I dont owe you anything for references as 
in my opinion you can do your own research.

> Thank you,
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT

** In any case I consider both subjects long past and closed and only a very 
petty person would keep bringing them up.
Maybe it is time for you to take another long absence from here.

Carl
KM1H



> _______________________________________________
> Amps mailing list
> Amps at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1432 / Virus Database: 3629/6351 - Release Date: 11/20/13
> 

_______________________________________________
Amps mailing list
Amps at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/amps