Canadian Scores - CQ WW SSB

ve2zp at bbs.ve3jf.ampr.org ve2zp at bbs.ve3jf.ampr.org
Fri Nov 4 03:41:21 EST 1994


Here are some of the claimed scores of Canadian entrants in the 
1994 CQ WW DX SSB.  If you have any information on other Canadian claimed
scores, please let me know.  I write a monthly column on contesting in the
Canadian magazine "The Canadian Amateur" (TCA), and I would like to include 
as many claimed or rumoured scores as possible.

CQ WW DX SSB 1994
Canadian Claimed Scores
VE7IN A 1303q 89z 142c 674,289
VY2SS A 1100q 65z 168c 547k
VE6SH AQ 258q 51z 67c 61,124
VE3HX 28
VG7NTT 14 2375q 33z 105c 668,848
VD7C 14 2000q 34z 118c 
VE3RM 14 1074q 31z 116c 389,991
VE7SV 7 700q 
VE7SZ 3.5 1100q 23z 49c 162k
VE7CC 3.5 827q 21z 48c 109k
VG3EJ MS 4215q 139z 518c 6.19Meg
VE2PZ MS 2163q 93z 220c 1,490,016
VE6FI MS 1641q 83z 157c 793,000
VA3SK MS 1200q 600k
VG9DH MM 4853q 108z 366c 5.3Meg
VE7ZZZ MM? unknown
Breakdowns of some multi-band entrants:
      VE6SH AQ    VG3EJ MS      VE2PZ MS     VE6FI MS     VG9DH MM
160    1  1  1   467  12  25     0  0   0     3  2   2   218   5   8
 80   24  7  6  1084  23  78   703 20  45    60  7   9   718  13  48
 40   43 14 20   836  31 113   268 22  40   293 17  32   593  20  62
 20  145 17 29  1094  36 145   855 24  78  1117 30  75  2570  34 134
 15   15  8  8   501  23 113   231 18  44   152 21  33   667  21  72
 10   30  4  3   233  14  44   106  9  13    16  6   6   109  14  41
Tot  258q51z67c 4215q139z518c 2163q93z220c 1641q83z156c 4853q107z365c
       =61,124    =6.19Meg     =1,490,016    =793,000    =5,109,400
A=Single op all bands
Q=QRP
14=Single op single band
MS=Multi-op, single tx
MM=Multi-op, multi-tx
q=QSOs
z=Zones
c=Countries

73, Dave VE2ZP/VE9CB -- one of the frustrated ops at VG9DH
InterNet: ve2zp at va3tcp.ampr.org
Packet: VE2ZP at VA3TCP.#EON.ON.CAN.NOAM

>From barry at w2up.wells.com (Barry Kutner)  Tue Nov  8 21:40:05 1994
From: barry at w2up.wells.com (Barry Kutner) (Barry Kutner)
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 94 21:40:05 GMT
Subject: Part time entries
Message-ID: <iDRHVc2w165w at w2up.wells.com>

I second the motion for part-time entries (which I've advocated before). 
Rather than picking the BEST 8 hours, I suggest limiting op time to a 
certain period, whether 8, 12, or 24 hours, not a best out of whatever. 
This way, part of the op's "skill" is deciding when to operate, and when 
to placate the family.

--

Barry N. Kutner, W2UP       Usenet/Internet: barry at w2up.wells.com
Newtown, PA                 Packet Radio: W2UP @ WB3JOE.#EPA.PA.USA.NA
                            Packet Cluster: W2UP >K2TW (FRC)
.......................................................................


>From barry at w2up.wells.com (Barry Kutner)  Tue Nov  8 21:53:41 1994
From: barry at w2up.wells.com (Barry Kutner) (Barry Kutner)
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 94 21:53:41 GMT
Subject: N4RJ SS CW
Message-ID: <7ZRHVc4w165w at w2up.wells.com>

jholly at hposl42.cup.hp.com (Jim Hollenback) writes:

> Yeah, they were fun .... I ignored them and kept working Q's. They
> really get bent out of shape during RTTY contest when the gang fills
> the band from .065 to .105. Had one guy actually get on RTTY to lecture
> me about band edges ... pointed out to him RTTY is legal from 14.000 to 
> 14.150 ... found out he could not take a joke.
> 

Yes, some guys get VERY protective of THEIR frequencies.
The worst I've experienced was while operating CQWW RTTY, CQing at 7035.
The CW ragchewers go nuts, telling me RTTY "belongs" at 070. Not in 
Europe it doesn't! Maybe I should tell them I'm a military station in 
Haiti...

--

Barry N. Kutner, W2UP       Usenet/Internet: barry at w2up.wells.com
Newtown, PA                 Packet Radio: W2UP @ WB3JOE.#EPA.PA.USA.NA
                            Packet Cluster: W2UP >K2TW (FRC)
.......................................................................


>From barry at w2up.wells.com (Barry Kutner)  Tue Nov  8 21:46:16 1994
From: barry at w2up.wells.com (Barry Kutner) (Barry Kutner)
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 94 21:46:16 GMT
Subject: Part-Time SS
Message-ID: <TNRHVc3w165w at w2up.wells.com>

Trey Garlough <GARLOUGH at TGV.COM> writes:

> Nonetheless, I agree that time management is very hard.  I would like to
> see the ARRL include "hours operated" in the line scores for all contests
> as done with Sweepstakes.  The would give part time guys a chance to see
> how well they did compared to people who operated similar amounts of time.

Trey - I don't know about your experience with ARRL's time listing for 
SS, but a few years ago I operated 4 hours, had a very good rate, and I 
was listed as operating 24 hours. I dropped them a note, and they said a 
correction would be listed, but it never was.

--

Barry N. Kutner, W2UP       Usenet/Internet: barry at w2up.wells.com
Newtown, PA                 Packet Radio: W2UP @ WB3JOE.#EPA.PA.USA.NA
                            Packet Cluster: W2UP >K2TW (FRC)
.......................................................................




More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list