The "Bigger Mosley Antennas" -- A Po

[KWIDELITZ at delphi.com]

For the record, I have not taken down my PRO-96, although I am considering
it. The PRO-96 is a compromise antenna (6 bands, 9 elements on a 36' boom,)
and the biggest compromise is on 20 meters, the only band on which I would
rate the antenna unsatisfactory. I find it great on 40 & 10 and satisfactory
on 15. It isn't a monobander, but it does give you a lot. I also had a TA-33
up for a long time and it was a great antenna for what it was.

73. Ken, AB6FO, KWIDELITZ at DELPHI.COM

>From wb4iuy at nando.net (Dave Hockaday)  Tue Aug  6 21:05:04 1996
From: wb4iuy at nando.net (Dave Hockaday) (Dave Hockaday)
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 1996 16:05:04 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: FCC Exposure rule
Message-ID: <199608062005.QAA03044 at bessel.nando.net>

I think this will be a large thorn in the side of Amateur Radio if we're
expected to conform or else...


>To: Earl Needham <needhame at 3lefties.com>
>From: Dave Hockaday <wb4iuy at nando.net>
>Subject: re: FCC Exposure rule
>
>At 12:12 PM 8/6/96 -0700, you wrote:
>>
>>	Thank you , Dr. Overbeck (N6NB).  Please continue to protect us from
>>ourselves.
>>
>>>  From: 71111.260 at CompuServe.COM (Hans Brakob), on 8/6/96 10:30 AM:
>>>  Here are some excerpts from the FCC comments relative to amateur
>>>  exemption.
>>>  
>>>       "83. Several parties address continuation of the
Dave Hockaday Wb4iuy
wb4iuy at nando.net

http://www.webbuild.com/~wb4iuy/teara.html
(alternate)http://www.geocities.com/TheTropics/3341/
http://www.RTPnet.org/~fcarc/
(alternate)http://www.geocities.com/TheTropics/3212/
http://www.webbuild.com/~wb4iuy/
(alternate)http://www.geocities.com/TheTropics/3489/
http://www.geocities.com/TheTropics/3349/
http://www.RTPnet.org/~rdrc/