[CQ-Contest] Re: W9XR' s experiment
Jim Pratt
n6ig at netcom.com
Tue Dec 9 17:04:44 EST 1997
> << ARRL 160 Meter Contest Results
>
>
> W3GH (Multi-op, W3GH & W9XR op's)
> 789 Q's & 85 Mults for 137,190 points (Friday Night)
>
>
> W9XR (Multi-op, W9XR & W3GH op's)
> 952 Q's & 92 Mults for 180,946 points (Saturday Night)
Gee, I did that last year as W6AX and N6IG. Boy, did the contest
"community", at least as represented on the reflector here, have a fit!
I got all sorts of complaints, threats, and comments that people were
going to lobby the league to "put a stop to this" and change the rules.
After all, "it wasn't fair"; I couldn't really understand that thought,
I was giving EVERYONE ELSE two QSOs and I was removing myself from
serious competition in the Pacific Division. And I was happy to see the
rules weren't changed.
I was going to try it this year with THREE callsigns, but am suffering a
serious case of contest burnout at the moments. Thanks to the good
Doctor for keeping the tradition alive.
73 and Happy Holidaze...
Jim N6IG
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list