[CQ-Contest] SSB NAQP

[Mike Fatchett]

I had the opportunity to tune around when my guest op was taking his off
time.  20 had died, 40 was long and everyone was on 80 and 160.  Not having
gotten on for CW I can't compare.  I sure picked a good one to miss!

Mike
W0MU




> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-cq-contest at contesting.com
> [mailto:owner-cq-contest at contesting.com]On Behalf Of Lee Buller
> Sent: Monday, January 19, 1998 2:41 PM
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] SSB NAQP
>
>
> Hey....anyone awake out there?  HELLLOOOOOOOOO?
>
> I am surprised as to the lack of braggin rights on the reflector today
about
> SSB NAQP.  Are all you guys nursing your contesting hangovers?
>
> What did you guys think of the propagation.  IMHO, CW propagation was
better
> that SSB weekend.  I worked more mults on CW than SSB or was that the
> effects of 1) more crowded bands so the weaker signals were in the din, 2)
> my superior CW skills, 3) CW really rules in crowded noisy conditions, 4)
I
> need to move back to AM with a pair of 813s, 5) propagation was
> wacky, 6) other.
>
> What ever it was....it was fun.
>
> Lee "Leroy" Buller
> k0wa at southwind.net
> "Really...its my given name!  Now you know why I changed in years ago and
> don't ask me for my wife's name.  It would really sound we are from
Kansas"
>
>
>
>
> --
> CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
>



--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com