[CQ-Contest] Contest Ethics - A Case Study?
k0hb at juno.com
Fri May 22 00:57:36 EDT 1998
>* Entered as Single Operator (indicating they did not use
>PacketCluster): WB8RNY, W0VFO, K2MP, N9PQU
If they only used the cluster to send spots (others, not themselves),
and not read spots, then this (I think) is legal. Most (all?) of
your examples, however, seem to be begging for mults/spotting
>* Entered as Multi Operator (indicating they used PacketCluster, but
>what about the soliciting contact angle?): W5GAD, W5YM, KC3M, N2WB,
>WK1P, N1HKO, AE1M, WW3S, N9XX
This is totally legit. The "soliciting contact angle" applies to
*non-amateur* means, such as phone calls.
>* No contest entry made (I guess they were just in it for the fun):
Nothing wrong with this --- if you do not submit a log for credit you
can do anything you want. Few years back there was even a multi-multi
unlimited on SS (K5LZO is I remember right).
73, de Hans, K0HB
#2, MN SSB High Power
#4, MN CW High Power
Second Place = First Loser
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest