[CQ-Contest] Re: Bad practices identified
Jimk8mr at aol.com
Jimk8mr at aol.com
Mon Jul 24 14:59:56 EDT 2000
In a message dated 7/24/00 12:00:08 PM Eastern Daylight Time, w7ti at jps.net
writes:
>
> For contesting purposes, perhaps a single ? should be used in place of QRL?
> anyway. In the context of contesting, it's meaning would be quite clear.
> Comments welcome.
This is what I have done for years. Not only is it quicker, but it has the
additional meaning of "Who was that who was just calling CQ, who I might want
to work?" instead of QRL's sole meaning of "I am about to jump on this
frequency and start CQing". I find the first use much more polite when the
millisecond of silence was just a pause between CQs.
My reply to a "?" is my call or a quick CQ if I was CQing, or an
"Di-Dah-Di-Di-Dit" if I am working someone.
Jim K8MR
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list