[CQ-Contest] SO2R is not unsportmanlike
Bill Coleman AA4LR
aa4lr at radio.org
Wed Jul 26 18:25:49 EDT 2000
On 7/23/00 1:29, Bruce Sawyer at n6nt at ynn.com wrote:
>This is the key: "SKILLED" SO2R operators. The problem is that 99% of the
>so-called SO2R operators are NOT skilled at it, and I would characterize
>many of those who are not as at least bordering on unsportsman-like.
And how does one obtain that skill?
I'll agree that a poor operator is a lid, no matter how many radios he
uses. But you can't fault people for trying to improve their skills.
Still, I can't see any legitimate way for an inexperienced SO2R op to
"take up" more than one frequency at a time.
SO2R is really a misnomer. It's really SO 2R 1T (single operator, two
receiver, one transmitter). It appears to be a continuing myth amoung
some SO1R ops that those with two radios transmit on more than one
frequency at a time. It just isn't so.
Bill Coleman, AA4LR, PP-ASEL Mail: aa4lr at radio.org
Quote: "Boot, you transistorized tormentor! Boot!"
-- Archibald Asparagus, VeggieTales
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list