[CQ-Contest] Packet pile ups - do we need them?
Mike Gilmer - N2MG
n2mg at contesting.com
Tue Nov 28 10:11:51 EST 2000
On Tue, 28 November 2000, K3BU at aol.com wrote:
> windev at inetmarket.com writes:
>
> > Paul, K1XM, at P29VPY this past
> > weekend, used this most excellent
> > time-proven technique: operate split.
>
> Yep, especially "welcome," when you
> have "your" frequency invaded by
> "splitters."
Yeah, I heard this happen. It was ugly.
The poor guy didn't know what hit him.
"At least" he was a contester. When this
happens on 40 phone, the "losers" are
often diehard statesiders chatting with
their buddies. Much uglier (at least WRT
our collective reputation).
> I guess one solution is for DX to
> jump to another frequency, leave the
> packeteers QRMing each other and start
> the fresh run (until is spotted again).
>
I witnessed this as well. I think it was
VP2EST - he just disappeared from the
frequency - sure enough, he was just a kHz
up the band calling CQ. He was easy meat
at that point. I did NOT re-spot him - I
figured let someone else do it and ruin
it again. After I worked him, I went back
to his original freq - pileup was still in
progress.
> I remember the days when contesting
> depended on the operator skill on
> finding the multiplier, and DX had
> fun working one after another as
> people were discovering it and
> working in nice sequence.
>
Well, the rude pileups are nothing new.
Years ago, before CT, bandmaps and packet,
operators with marginal signals would tune
the bands, calling stations instead of
running. It seemed they all had the same
complaint back then, too, "If I try to run,
I cannot control the pileup." So packet
has not caused this problem, but it has
made it acute - a situation that might
have built up over many minutes now occurs
in just one or two, depriving the DX of
almost any time running.
I'm not trying to defend packet - if it
went away (which it won't), I wouldn't
miss it much.
73 Mike N2MG
________________________________________________
PeoplePC: It's for people. And it's just smart.
http://www.peoplepc.com
--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list