[CQ-Contest] CC&R Category

[Kelly Taylor]

I was doing it at work on the Web. Our ISP's Web-based e-mail system sucks...

Anyway, the gist of what I said was this:

Many developments with CC&Rs feature HUGE lots, so to restrict it in size to the size you mention would exclude a lot of people under CC&Rs. As well, the lot size you mention allows for some pretty significant antennas, a la perennial top-tenner K6LL and VE4GV, perennial low-power SS champ, both of whom use single towers with KT34XAs and 2-el 40-meter beams on top.

They also have lots smaller than you describe, so I believe both of Bill's suggested criteria should stand.

73 kelly
ve4xt

----------
From: 	Sylvan Katz[SMTP:jskatz at sk.sympatico.ca]
Sent: 	25-Sep-00 12:06
To: 	ktaylor at mb.sympatico.ca
Subject: 	Re: [CQ-Contest] CC&R Category

Hi --- For some reason the reply you posted to me and the reflector did
not contain anything from you. I am sure interested in hearing what you
have to say

bye
Sylvan


--
Sylvan Katz
Saskatoon, Sask
VE5ZX & G0TZX





--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com