[CQ-Contest] packet cheaters caught?

[LU-CONTESTERS]

All in all, the only solution to solve the problem, seems to be the
elimination of single op assisted class.
In other words you cannot fight with techmology, you have to asimilate it.
Allowing single ops to use packet eliminates the possibility of bad guys
taking unfair advantage. It allows the latest technology to be used by
everybody.
73 Martín
----- Original Message -----
From: Steve Lund <wa8lly at pacbell.net>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2000 11:02 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] packet cheaters caught?


>
> Scott Ellington, K9MA, wrote:
> >
> > More than once, a local packet user has attracted my attention by
calling a
> > station (presumably) spotted.  I've then identified the station and
worked him,
> > leaving the local still trying break the pile-up.  I'm sure this happens
to
> > others all the time.  The timing makes it look like cheating, but it's
not my
> > fault my neighbor has key clicks!
> >
> The situation is very much the same for those of us using a 2nd
> receiver.
>
> I pulled the plug on packet 4 years ago. I added a 2nd receiver and
> found it was more valuable in finding new multipliers than packet. As I
> run low power, I must work the new mult before it gets spotted or else
> it goes into the BandMap. The 2nd receiver makes it easy to know what
> the locals are doing and checking propagation on other bands.
>
> 73,
> Steve K6UM
>
>
> --
> CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
>


--
CQ-Contest on WWW:        http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests:  cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com