[CQ-Contest] Is there ever any thought to........
n5rp at pdq.net
Mon Sep 11 12:32:05 EDT 2000
At 11:08 9/11/00, Bill Coleman wrote:
(re: doing away with packet in contests)
>I don't think that's such a great idea.
>It isn't the handful of guys in the top-10 categories that make the
>contest. It's all the little guys with a peanut-whistle rig and a wet
>noodle for antenna. They are the ones that load up the big-gun's logs
>with all the contacts. Many of these guys don't even send in a log.
These fellows could use their packet systems.
As you say, they are not in the contest.
> >What if we just went back to doing our own hamming during a contest?
>Hey, what a unique idea!
Well, I don't think unique is the descriptive phrase, but I have to
believe that it would make the contests broader in scope.
Once upon a time, there were other fellows sitting at radios, scanning
the bands, deciding what bands to scan as a function of time and
propagation, and those "other ops" were just as important to the end
score as the main op.
Today, "multi-op" more or less means "multi run", with the rest of the
necessary point adding actions being pretty much replaced by a screen
and a couple of keyboard actions.
Amateur Radio Station N5RP
mailto:N5RP at pdq.net
N5RP Station Page: http://freeweb.pdq.net/perring/station.html
WP2Z '99 CQWW SSB Pictures: http://freeweb.pdq.net/perring/wp2zpix.html
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest