[CQ-Contest] KT34XA Vs C3

[IK0YVV Marco]

Hi Claudio ,
I've been using a KT34XA since October 1999 on a 60ft self supported tower ,
using a G-1000SDX rotator , and i have to say that the antenna performs
really well . Outstanding reports on 20m ( maybe the most performer band for
the kt34xa ) , quiete easy to take the fruequency during contests . In the
past i use the C3 on a CQWW SSB and i've to say that even the kt34a performs
better than the C3 so i think that between a C3 and a KT34XA without an
doubt i would put the old , but ever green , KLM.
GL CUL U SN !

IK0YVV

Marco


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com


>From G3SJJ" <g3sjj at btinternet.com  Fri Aug 24 19:28:12 2001
From: G3SJJ" <g3sjj at btinternet.com (G3SJJ)
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2001 19:28:12 +0100
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Re: [iota-contest] IOTA Contest Logs
References: <008501c12cbc$0117df20$451f7bd5 at g3xtt>
Message-ID: <005301c12cca$9431eb80$577a7ad5 at default>


>I have also accepted Cabrillo files, although this is not one of the acceptable
> formats listed in the rules (but I wouldn't dare upset my good friend N5KO,
> of Cabrillo fame!).

Just to clarify.    .LOG files are listed in the rules as being acceptable, though
most of these are now in Cabrillo format, which isn't mentioned in the rules.

Looking forward to seeing a full list of claimed scores in October, Don.

Keep up the good work. It's hard going. I know!  73 Chris


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com