[CQ-Contest] Re: K4OJ's problem
w9re at worldnet.att.net
Wed Dec 19 18:39:56 EST 2001
One other thing that I haven't seen brought up yet on the subject of working
dupes is this.
I was using totally new (to me) software in the contest. I had it
configured to work dupes in the cq mode but not to work dupes in the s/p
mode (this seems like an obvious thing to do). Everything seemed fine until
late Saturday afternoon when several stations on SSB s/p (I was operating on
both modes) told me I was a dupe! Since several stations said so, I was
really concerned, then I discovered that my software was not telling me who
was a dupe or not! I couldn't figure out what to do but luckily a local
that I called (who has used the program a while) was able to help me figure
out what the problem was but even this took a few minutes. All was fine
Sunday until I noticed late in the contest it again was not telling me of
all the dupes (I remember duping W4AN) late Sunday night on cw (I knew I had
worked him but it didn't show up). One other thing to point out was that I
was calling 'CQ' 100% of the time and doing just a little s/p on the other
I never work dupes if I can help it and am sure glad some SSB stations
pointed this factor out to me (rather than just working me routinely as a
dupe) on Saturday night or else I might not have figured out that the
setting up software was in error (I'm guessing this). Really like the s/w
but not the inability to see dupes immediately.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-cq-contest at contesting.com
> [mailto:owner-cq-contest at contesting.com]On Behalf Of Pete Smith
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:53 AM
> To: Bill Tippett; cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: K4OJ's problem
> At 03:08 PM 12/18/01 +0000, Bill Tippett wrote:
> >>not just guess, or make something up? He's not going to count anyway...
> > I just hate putting anything into my log that I KNOW is not correct.
> >It also takes another round after getting a weak call for him to send
> >exchange...and it's usually these guys that send my call, their call and
> >exchange each 3 times at 10 WPM...and then add their family history! I
> >don't know how many times I've struggled with a weak station getting a
> >serial number correct...and THEN he corrects his call to one that is
> >already in my log...ARRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHH!
> I think there's another good reason to do this -- you may not have been in
> HIS log the first time (pileup error or something), and if not, and he
> sends his log in, that QSO won't count. If you fake the serial number the
> second time, you could lose both QSOs.
> I suggest everyone just accept dupes as overhead and move on.
> 73, Pete N4ZR
> CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest