[CQ-Contest] Re: Logging Dupes

Jim Reisert jjreisert at alum.mit.edu
Wed Dec 19 18:01:51 EST 2001

I'll bet the callsign was busted on packet.  That can account for 
outrageous pileups when guys are desperate to work anything new that 
moves.  If you still have your logs, it would be interesting to compare 
against the archived spots on the OH2AQ web cluster to see if there is 

73 - Jim AD1C

At 10:26 PM 12/19/2001 +0200, Tonno Vahk wrote:
>My feeling is that there are stations who dupe some multipliers deliberately
>in the second half of the contest when the rates are slow to make sure that
>they are in the log.
>In CQWW CW, I remember that we had quite nice US pile-ups on 40m and 20m at
>ES9C in the last hours of the contest and in times more than half of the
>QSOs were dupes. It was really funny. And most of them were 1x2 US calls
>probably quite seriously in the contest so we could copy each other very
>well and probably copied as well during the first QSO.

Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.com

CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list