[CQ-Contest] Re: Logging Dupes

[Jamie WW3S]

search for ei9c....

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Reisert" <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>
To: "Tonno Vahk" <tonno.vahk at mail.ee>; <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 6:01 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: Logging Dupes


>
> I'll bet the callsign was busted on packet.  That can account for
> outrageous pileups when guys are desperate to work anything new that
> moves.  If you still have your logs, it would be interesting to compare
> against the archived spots on the OH2AQ web cluster to see if there is
> correlation.
>
> 73 - Jim AD1C
>
> At 10:26 PM 12/19/2001 +0200, Tonno Vahk wrote:
> >My feeling is that there are stations who dupe some multipliers
deliberately
> >in the second half of the contest when the rates are slow to make sure
that
> >they are in the log.
> >
> >In CQWW CW, I remember that we had quite nice US pile-ups on 40m and 20m
at
> >ES9C in the last hours of the contest and in times more than half of the
> >QSOs were dupes. It was really funny. And most of them were 1x2 US calls
> >probably quite seriously in the contest so we could copy each other very
> >well and probably copied as well during the first QSO.
>
>
> --
> Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
> USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.com
>
>
> --
> CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
>


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com