[CQ-Contest] Logging Dupes

[Rex Maner]

Quacks
A common response that I use when somone is a dupe and discovers it after
getting the call correction or otherwise is TNX anyway .  ( Its better to
have you in the log twice than NOT once,  73 Have fun ) F1
Rex
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Reisert" <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>
To: "Scott Nichols" <snichols at mvosprey.com>; <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2001 15:14
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Logging Dupes


>
> You're certainly entitled to your opinion.  However, now you are
penalizing
> the station who didn't get a contact the first time for whatever reason,
as
> well as yourself, because the first QSO probably doesn't count in your log
> either.
>
> I think it's become obvious here that the good operators (the ones who
make
> the top-10 boxes year after year) work the dupe and move on.  If you want
> to get into the box, this is one of the ways to do it - NEVER leave a
> potential QSO on the floor, for whatever reason.
>
> 73 - Jim AD1C
>
> At 02:29 PM 12/18/2001 -0400, Scott Nichols wrote:
>
> >Dupes are considered blemishes in my log...I therefore use F7 very often
> >and then move on...That's my own opinion...
>
>
> --
> Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
> USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.com
>
>
> --
> CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
> Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com
>


--
CQ-Contest on WWW: http://lists.contesting.com/_cq-contest/
Administrative requests: cq-contest-REQUEST at contesting.com