[CQ-Contest] RE: Meaningful Contest Exchange

[Bob Wanderer]

You want meaningful?  How about Zip+4!

:-)

Leave the existing contest exchanges as they are.  If you
want a "meaningful" exchange, create a new contest (call it
the "Meaningful Exchange Contest" or MEC) for those who want
it.

I have enough "meaning" in my life, I don't need it in
contests.  The "meaningful" sweepstakes exchange is more
than enough (for me) in that category.

73
Bob AA0CY

-----Original Message-----
From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com]On Behalf Of
Grillo's
Sent: Saturday, May 08, 2004 8:40 AM
To: Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO); cq-contest at contesting.com;
ng7z at arrl.net
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RE: Meaningful Contest Exchange


zip code is a 5 digit number

----- Original Message -----
From: "Alfred J. Frugoli (KE1FO)" <frugoli at worldlinkisp.com>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>; <ng7z at arrl.net>
Sent: Friday, May 07, 2004 7:16 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] RE: Meaningful Contest Exchange


I hope all of you who have posted on this topic to the
reflector have also
e-mailed the contest advisory committee with your comments.
Also, we should
consider some other options, such as are there contests we
can influence on
a much shorter timeline?  Most of the "newer" contests do
use a fairly
meaningful exchange, such as the sprints and the internet
sprint.

A 2nd thought is that even geographically derived exchanges
are less than
exciting.  CQWW with computers and accurate cty files is
pretty much a no
brainer anymore.  Serial numbers are the best in my mind,
but those of us
with computers should generate random 5 digit serial
numbers.  No more
sitting in line and knowing what you're serial number will
be when you get
through the pileup!  Totally possible to do and log check
accuratly.  5
digits is a pretty good challenge and it would allow unique
numbers even for
multi ops who do over 9999 q's.

73 de Al, KE1FO

----- Original Message -----
From: Paul Beringer
Sent: 5/7/2004 7:57:06 PM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: [CQ-Contest] RE: Meaningful Contest Exchange

> >Message: 11
> >Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 22:08:22 +0100
> >From: "K0HB " <k-zero-hb at earthlink.net>
> >Subject: [CQ-Contest] Meaningful Contest Exchange
> >To: "CQ-Contest" <CQ-Contest at contesting.com>, "MWA
Reflector"
> > <mn-wireless-assn at yahoogroups.com>
> >Message-ID: <410-2200454621822656 at earthlink.net>
> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> >
> >May/June NCJ, page 23 article by K6VVA.
> >
> >I second the motion!
> >
> >73, de Hans, K0HB
>
> What an excellent idea! A more challenging exchange makes
for more
> meaningful contest. For us newbies, the "5nn k" is really
a no brainer.
I'd
> like to be able to believe that what I am copying is a
real
number/message.
> Good for the code speed too. Just as long as 1's and 9's
don't degenerate
> into "a" and "n". Just my two cents worth.
>
> 73 Paul NG7Z (still trying to get out of this #$%^ condo!)
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.673 / Virus Database: 435 - Release Date:
5/1/2004
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest