[CQ-Contest] SS Gentlemen's Agreement re: Assistance

[Kenneth E. Harker]

On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 10:06:53AM -0500, Steve London wrote:
> I totally support all 5 points, and have operated this way for as long as I can
> remember.
> 
> For my own, personal list, I would add:
> 
> 6. We may only make post-contest changes to our log using information directly
> obtained on-the-air, and personally noted during the contest period.

I agree with all of these points as well, including #6.

> 
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
> 
> 
> >>Given the recent discussion regarding what constitutes assistance, I propose
> >>those of us on the reflector who have made it into the Top Ten box, or who
> >>strive to do so, enter into a gentlemen's agreement for Sweepstakes, above
> >>and beyond the published rules and our personal interpretation of them, that
> >>we will abide by the following:
> >>
> >>1. We will not call CQ indicating a needed section;
> >>2. We will not solicit, over the air, during the contest, information
> >>regarding a needed section;
> >>3. We will not set up schedules prior to the contest;
> >>4. We will not request, prior to or during the contest, that we be passed
> >>any unsolicited information during the contest;
> >>5. We may act on any information overheard on the air so long as we have not
> >>solicited that information in any way;
> >>
> >>I believe all other scenarios are covered by the existing rules. This
> >>gentlemen's agreement does not apply to the Unlimited or Multi category.
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

-- 
Kenneth E. Harker WM5R
kenharker at kenharker.com
http://www.kenharker.com/