[CQ-Contest] ARRL "endorses" cut numbers

Zack Widup w9sz at prairienet.org
Wed Jun 6 09:19:58 EDT 2007

Maybe we should use this set of cut numbers:


Note they use "N" for 2 and "M" for 9.  :-(

73, Zack W9SZ

On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Paul J. Piercey wrote:

> Although your point is valid, it is legal if it has been agreed to in
> advance that cut numbers are acceptable and the precedent seems to have been
> already set.
> 73 -- Paul VO1HE

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list