[CQ-Contest] Feedback on 160m Test Log Analyzer...

[Steve Lott]

Bob,

while I only played in that contest a little and did not yet, use this log
analyzer

I wanted to thank you for you work on the logbook tools
the ARRL SS version continues to be one of our valued tools
for planning ARRL SS station and team members operation

73
steve
kg5vk

http://stopsandmore.blogspot.com/
For Fellow Photographers

http://www.KG5VK.com
My Ham Radio Friends

http://www.LottsPhoto.com
Our Studio Website


On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc at pclink.com>wrote:

> Hello Contesters,
>
> I added a feature to the ARRL 160m Log Analyzer and would like some
> feedback regarding the workbook performance.
>
> I added a new worksheet for each log. They list the first 100 callsigns
> found in your log for each ARRL/RAC Section. For example, if you worked 5
> stations in Alabama, this new worksheet will display their callsigns on the
> Alabama row. You will see each Section is a row on this report. The
> callsigns appear in the order you worked them, left to right.
>
> It was necessary to create a VBA macro to reduce the complexity of the
> formulas needed to mine this data. You will see a warning message whether to
> enable macros when you open the workbook. Answer yes, otherwise the new
> worksheets will not be processed.
>
> The feedback I would like is when you import your log(s) is the length of
> time to process these new reports acceptable? Second, are the first 100
> callsigns adequate for this report? Could there be less? Should there be
> more?
>
> Here's the link to the 160m Test workbook for download. It's a 6.3 Mb file
> so it might take some time to download it. Consider this a "beta" version.
> It has a short name to signify its status.
>
> http://tinyurl.com/67qymp
>
> Thanks!
>
> 73 de Bob  - KØRC in MN
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>