[CQ-Contest] CW Skimmer in NAQP?

Pete Smith n4zr at contesting.com
Fri Dec 24 05:54:45 PST 2010

Lest there be any doubt, unless/until NAQP CW has an Assisted category, 
I totally agree that use of CW Skimmer should not be allowed.  I think 
there is plenty of room in our little world for both Assisted and 
Non-Assisted competition, and that the distinction between the two is 
useful.  An easy line to draw?  Not always, but worth the effort.

73, Pete N4ZR

The World Contest Station Database, updated daily at www.conteststations.com
The Reverse Beacon Network at http://reversebeacon.net, blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com,
spots at telnet.reversebeacon.net, port 7000

On 12/24/2010 12:40 AM, Larry - K7SV wrote:
> "Yeah, the RTTY Roundup is starting to look like a better option for that
> weekend"
> I think Steve N2IC expressed my sentiments with his comment. While I
> normally prefer CW contests, I think that joining my pals in doing a multi
> effort in the RTTY Roundup sounds like more fun than fighting the RTTY on 40
> and competing on CW with those that use skimmer. I've been rebuilding the
> antennas at home to work NAQP and the Sprints. Guess it's now going to be
> the Sprints. Thank goodness the effectiveness of this great technology is
> limited by the rules of the Sprints!
> 73 de Lar K7SV
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list