[CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened

[Zrinko Zibert]

I find actually ok, because they give more chance to NON ASS Stations
because they don't use any skimmer/cluster spot...

73s, Zik DK8ZZ




2014-01-30 <john at kk9a.com>:

> What is the penalty - disqualification?  While it is a poor practice to
> not regularly I.D., a person can easily make 3 QSOs in 15 seconds and in
> the heat of the moment it is possible to forget and make a 4th or even 5th
> QSO in less than 1/2 minute before remembering to send a callsign. I would
> not consider this scenario to be unsportsmanlike conduct.
>
> John KK9A - P40A
>
>
> To:      <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Subject:         [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened
> From:    "Vladimir Sidarau" <vs.lists at gmail.com>
> Reply-to:        Vladimir Sidarau <vs.lists at gmail.com>
> Date:    Wed, 29 Jan 2014 15:43:07 -0500
>
> Perhaps I just have not seen it before.
>
> Reading the CQ WPX Rules 2014:
>
> qt
> --
>
> XII. A. Unsportsmanlike Conduct: Examples of unsportsmanlike conduct
> include, but are not limited to:
> ...
> 6. Running stations making more than 3 contacts without sending their
> callsign.
>
> unqt
> ---
>
> Thanks to the CQ WPX Contest Commitee.
>
> 73,
>
> Vlad VE3IAE
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>



-- 
73s, Zrinko Zibert (Zik) DK8ZZ, VE3ZIK, YT3ZZ