[CQ-Contest] Preview of CQWW Rules 2015

[Yan (XV4Y)]

Hi Chris,

I was talking about IARU HF where "one QSO" and "no log" stations are many due to the nationals working there HQ station.

Yes log padding in CQ WW in WPX is risky, but UT5UGR showed us that you can do it for several years without being caught.
Adding 50 QSOs to a 2000 Qs log can go unnoticed, but if they are on 160m they count for 50 new multipliers!

73,
Yan.
---
Yannick DEVOS - XV4Y
http://www.qscope.org/
http://xv4y.radioclub.asia/

Le 22 mai 2015 à 12:04, Christian Schneider <prickler.schneider at t-online.de> a écrit :

> Hi Jan,
> that
> 
> run it into your log as you can go away with it without cross-checking possibility.
> 
> will not work reliably to the satisifaction for an offender. Logchecking also extends to logs of stations not submitting a log. Rather easy in a contest with serials like WPX. The offender then needs to guess a serial for "his" time he wants to insert the QSO. It will be seen from the tracelogs of this station if the number fits - very risky. Also Uniques are a case for checking as a known source of potential mischief. There are also a lot of ways to check. But of course: It is a matter of work and time invested, but log padding is not without serious risk (admittedly a bit less in contests with fixed exchanges).
> 73 Chris DL8MBS