[CQ-Contest] "Improving SS"

[Radio K0HB]

And hey, as long as we're objecting to changing the mults in SS, shouldn't
go way-back-when to the time that Minnesota was two sections?

73, de Hans, KØHB
"Just a Boy and his Radio"™



On Sun, Jul 24, 2016 at 20:36 Art Boyars <artboyars at gmail.com> wrote:

> (Sorry if this has already been addressed.  I'm behind in reading the
> Reflector postings.)
>
> "The only thing I would do to improve SS is to delete those four VE3
> sections and go back to ON."
>
> What in the world are you talking about?  RAC made new Sections; they
> become multipliers in SS.  It's been that way longer than any of us can
> remember.
>
> Should we delete WCF and go back to just NFla and SFla?  Should we delete
> DE and go back to MDD? How about WTX?
>
> Would you delete ORG and go back to just LAX and SDG? (And delete whatever
> Calif Sections got added since the first SS?)
>
> And would you support DC as a mult in SS, because the (only) justification
> for it's not being a Mult is that it is not an ARRL Section?
>
> Sheesh!
>
> 73, Art K3KU
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>