[CQ-Contest] WRTC Countdown Is On (K3ZJ

Yuri ve3dz at rigexpert.net
Thu Jun 29 11:14:16 EDT 2023


IMHO such complaint would be the same as complaint on a DX (or 
DXpedition) being spotted in the Contest more often than the regular 
stations.
Or, for instance, N1UR, located in the rare state of VT would be spotted 
more often than, for example, a NY station...
Except in the above mentioned cases both N1UR and DX are competing with 
all others, and WRTC stations are only competing with (other) WRTC stations.
I agree with NN3W.

73, Yuri VE3DZ

On 6/28/2023 8:09 PM, Richard F DiDonna NN3W wrote:
> We're not competing with IARU stations. We're competing with WRTC
> stations.  Our point scoring is different; our multipliers are different;
> our entry class is different.
>
> Seriously, stop whining.
>
> 73 Rich NN3W
>
> On Wed, Jun 28, 2023 at 7:01 PM Edward Sawyer <
> EdwardS at advanced-conversion.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks for this information Fabio.  So essentially because the logs are
>> real time into the central system you are creating an SSB skimmer, not by
>> pulling signals off the air like CW Skimmer but by monitoring Qs logged on
>> a specific frequency.  While it may “level the playing field” in WRTC, it
>> is completely against the rules in IARU Championship for which the rest of
>> the world is participating and competing.  It also greatly increases the
>> SSB efficiency of WRTC competitors vs non-WRTC competitors.  Affecting
>> everybody’s scores even though not competing directly with each other.
>>
>> The WRTC is happening simultaneously with IARU.  Never before, to my
>> knowledge, has a WRTC rule or process, influenced the overall contest for
>> others in the contest.  It is after all the IARU Contest that is the norm
>> here, not WRTC.
>>
>> I would ask the committee to rescind this clearly unallowed process in the
>> IARU Contest.
>>
>> Thank you for your consideration of the rest of the contesting community.
>>
>> Ed  N1UR
>>
>>


More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list