[RTTY] An open letter to Shelby, K4WW
Rick Mintz
Rmintz at Rochester.rr.com
Sun Jul 23 10:26:01 EDT 2006
Hi Shelby.
As the "instigator" of the current SO1R vs. SO2R thread, I have been following the collective comments with interest. With the exception of some mini-flames and clearly unworkable suggestions, I think that the thread has voiced a heavy bias towards separate entry classes.
That being said, the thing that is the most gratifying, have been your comments. That you will lobby for a rule change demonstrates your commitment to the spirit of the contesting community. To see the need to correct what has become a "problem", and act upon it, despite the negative reactions from some, is to be commended. Thank you for your efforts in behalf of those that still realize that it is a hobby, and intended to be enjoyed. Keeping the contesting component an equal challenge for all is in the best spirit of competition.
Those that choose to submit as SO1R as they use a single radio for SO2R operating, can live with their own conscience. They must have something to prove... to themselves. Signing a statement as to the entry class used means nothing. The act of submitting a log should be enough to verify that the "intent" of the operator was to follow the class rules as they were intended to be interpreted. The rules are not a legal document and stretching them beyond the commonly accepted meaning only supports the operator in his attempt to appear better than he really is.
73 de Rick W1TY/W2RTY
More information about the RTTY
mailing list