[RTTY] Roundup observations - a bit long!

[John Webster]

If for example DXCC countries were to count as multipliers on each band 
instead of once only regardless of band, there would be more incentive for 
US stations to look for DX stations on all bands, thereby increasing 
activity on all bands that would attract DX stations. As another example, if 
contacts between continents were awarded two points instead of one, there 
would also be more incentive for US to work DX and for DX to become more 
active. These ideas are not new. You can see them at work in other RTTY and 
DX contests. RU is a bit of an anomaly in this regard I think in that the 
scoring structure is more like Sweep Stakes than a DX contest and yet DX is 
invited to participate in RU but not in SS.

John
NN1SS

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Al Kozakiewicz" <akozak at hourglass.com>
To: "Stanley Zawrotny" <k4sbz.stan at gmail.com>; "K1FWE" <k1fwe at earthlink.net>
Cc: <rtty at contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 5:41 PM
Subject: RE: [RTTY] Roundup observations - a bit long!


That's my theory.  When like 63 multipliers are from CONUS and Canada, it's 
clear that the ARRL takes the 'A' in 'ARRL' seriously.

Al
AB2ZY
________________________________________
From: RTTY [rtty-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Stanley Zawrotny 
[k4sbz.stan at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 5:22 PM
To: K1FWE
Cc: <rtty at contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Roundup observations - a bit long!

Do you think the difference is that it is the AMERICAN Radio Relay League 
RTTY Roundup vs CQ's Worldwide contests? The perception by DX stations being 
that it is a US contest, rather than a WW contest?

Stan, K4SBZ

"Real radio bounces off the sky."

> On Jan 7, 2014, at 2:19 PM, K1FWE <k1fwe at earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> Stan:
>
> IMHO, Its not just this last session. Like Don, I've noticed it every time 
> I get into the RU, which I admit has not been that often in recent years. 
> Its a major RTTY contest but DX participation from my perspective is down 
> for RU when compared to others like CQWW RTTY contests where there's lots 
> of DX. One could simply prove or disprove this theory by comparing the 
> numbers of DX entries across the major RTTY contests.
>
> 73,
> John
> NN1SS
>
> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Stanley Zawrotny <k4sbz.stan at gmail.com>
>> Sent: Jan 7, 2014 9:26 AM
>> To: John Webster <k1fwe at earthlink.net>
>> Cc: "<rtty at contesting.com>" <rtty at contesting.com>
>> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Roundup observations - a bit long!
>>
>> The lack of DX can be explained by the propagation reports for Saturday 
>> and Sunday. They were exceptionally poor.
>>
>> Stan, K4SBZ
>>
>> "Real radio bounces off the sky."
>>
>>> On Jan 6, 2014, at 7:02 PM, "John Webster" <k1fwe at earthlink.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> "The overall appearance of a lack of DX in the Roundup still amazes me. 
>>> If this had been WPX or CQWW, 10 and 15 meters would have
>>> been wall-to-wall Europe starting here at 1300Z and probably going well 
>>> past 2000Z with the high flux we had. That doesn't happen in
>>> Roundup. Or least that doesn't happen here during Roundup."Don - I 
>>> agree. Personally, I think the rules/awards don't give DX much incentive 
>>> to get into this one nor do they give US stations muchincentive to work 
>>> DX, particularly on 80 and 10. I usually can't do much in this contest 
>>> due to its proximity to the holidays, but that's just me. This year was 
>>> no exception.JohnNN1SS (ex K1FWE)
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty=