[RTTY] Band plan? (Re: FREQUENCY IN USE BY ... (JT65/JT9)

[Kai]

Hi Ron

Thanks
Kai



On 1/8/2014 8:00 PM, Ron Kolarik wrote:
> Kai,
>
> That link is busted, this one works
> http://www.ciarc.org/downloads/Digital_Mode_Band_Plan.pdf
> It references HFLink for most of it's plans, some of their stuff
> is dated and I have personal reasons not to trust anything from HFLink.
>
> If you want actual band usage then these are pretty good sources.
> They are NOT bandplans but usage, bandplans for the most part
> are a joke, they require ops to actually observe the plan even
> during contests.
> http://www.bandplans.com/
> http://homepage.ntlworld.com/wadei/160m_band_utilization.htm
> http://homepage.ntlworld.com/wadei/30m_band_utilization.htm
>
> Ron
> K0IDT
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kai" <k.siwiak at ieee.org>
> To: <rtty at contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2014 2:15 PM
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Band plan? (Re: FREQUENCY IN USE BY ... (JT65/JT9)
>
>
>> The data are from W7CIA, not W4.  Sorry!
>> 73
>> Kai, KE4PT
>>
>> On 1/8/2014 2:40 PM, Kai wrote:
>>> Peter,
>>> I see what you mean! Detailed info is pretty sparse.  I did find the 
>>> following "gentlemen's agreement" plan from W4CIA:
>>> http://www.ciarc.org/downloads/*Digital*_*Mode*_Band_Plan.pdf?
>>>
>>> 73,
>>> Kai, KE4PT
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/8/2014 12:42 PM, Peter Laws wrote:
>>>> On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 3:36 PM, Peter Laws<plaws at plaws.net>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Speaking of "whatever happened to ..." ... is there a good digital
>>>>> band-plan?  I tend not to use the one from the ARRL as it is often
>>>>> out-of-date and/or optimistic.  ;-)
>>>> Still looking for a band plan that lists where all the different modes
>>>> are congregated.  This is especially important for the "silent" mode
>>>> since you can, you know, hear the other modes.
>>>>
>>>> The ARRL Considerate Operator's Frequency Guide is not helpful.
>
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus 
> protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>