[RTTY] 2 tone vs MMTTY

[Glenn Anderson]

I've used both in contests and casual operating. I haven't seen any dramatic difference.  Personally, I like MMTTY better and it supports FSK. 

Glenn WB5TUF

<div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Dave AA6YQ <aa6yq at ambersoft.com> </div><div>Date:06/11/2014  12:32  (GMT-06:00) </div><div>To: 'W0MU Mike Fatchett' <w0mu at w0mu.com>,'rtty reflector' <rtty at contesting.com> </div><div>Subject: Re: [RTTY] 2 tone vs MMTTY </div><div>
</div>WinWarbler, a component of the free-ware DXLab Suite, includes both the MMTTY engine and the 2Tone engine, and simultaneously
displays the text that each decodes. I have seen circumstances in which 2Tone provides better decoding that MMTTY, and vice versa --
sometimes during the same QSO.

     73,

             Dave, AA6YQ (author, DXLab)

      

-----Original Message-----
From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of W0MU Mike Fatchett
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2014 11:25 AM
To: rtty reflector
Subject: [RTTY] 2 tone vs MMTTY

During the W1AW/0 Colorado event a number of the guys reported that they felt 2 tone did a better job than MMTTY.

This all anecdotal.  I have been using both on and off and most time while chasing DX there seems to be no clear winner with my
operations.

The nice part is having another decode screen confirm that what you see is a good call etc.

--
Mike W0MU

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty