[RTTY] FCC proposed 80m. expansion

[Al Kozakiewicz]

Umm, yes, I am an idiot unable to read the legend on the ARRL band map.

As Emily Litella would have said, "never mind".

Al
AB2ZY

-----Original Message-----
From: RTTY [mailto:rtty-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Al Kozakiewicz
Sent: Wednesday, March 02, 2016 4:20 PM
To: RLVZ at aol.com; RTTY contest group
Subject: Re: [RTTY] FCC proposed 80m. expansion

Absolutely.

A very large percentage of Technicians are strictly VHF/UHF FM and maybe a handful are 10m phone operators.  How many new ones are going to show up on that additional 50kHz when they are barely using the existing 80m spectrum space they already share with Generals and Extras with no restrictions except power?

Al
AB2ZY

________________________________________
From: RTTY <rtty-bounces at contesting.com> on behalf of RLVZ--- via RTTY <rtty at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 2, 2016 2:16 PM
To: rtty at contesting.com
Subject: [RTTY] FCC proposed 80m. expansion

In a message dated 3/2/2016 1:08:57 P.M. Eastern Standard Time, rtty-request at contesting.com writes:

Given  the crowding among digital mode users in the 3570 to 3600 kHz portion of  the band, I think being able to spread out those users across another 50  kHz might be a good idea.
As a RTTY contester, I agree 100% with the need for more 80m.  spectrum for RTTY.  The need is so great that the technician class  issue fails in comparison, so let's be careful not to encourage the FCC "to  throw the baby out with the bath water".

73,
Dick- K9OM
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty