[RTTY] Upside-down RTTY contest QSO's

[Jeff Stai]

It sounds more like a training or a documentation error, because the folks
doing this are doing it consistently. Either the tool is too easy to misuse
or the "how-to" is not directing them to the correct usage.

I'm never going to turn down a Q because of it. However, it is inefficient
and is not as robust in the face of marginal conditions. Many Qs have been
lost because the other op was unable or unwilling to break pattern. We both
lose when this happens, and less fun is had by all. 73 jeff wk6i

On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 1:24 PM, Robert Chudek - K0RC <k0rc at citlink.net>
wrote:

> Yes, an operation error. N1MM+ only moves the cursor into the RST field(s)
> if you use the *TAB* key. The operator should be using the *SPACEBAR* key
> to move between the call sign and the (unique) exchange fields. There is no
> need to pass through the RST fields with the cursor during a contest.
>
> 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> On 2/13/2017 2:46 PM, Jeff AC0C wrote:
>
>> If you are using N1MM and the ESM feature (common for RTTY operation
>> setup), the default the program will pick once you have the run guy's call
>> loaded is to send your call (correct in the sequence).  But if you have
>> anticipated the exchange and loaded it in, N1MM moves the pointer over to
>> the exchange (which is what these guys are sending).  The execution in both
>> cases is the same (right click).  That may be where this is coming from in
>> the N1MM case. It's not a program issue though - it's an operator error
>> issue because the N1MM/ESM flow works perfect if you are driving it
>> correctly.
>>
>> 73/jeff/ac0c
>> www.ac0c.com
>> alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Stai
>> Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 2:28 PM
>> To: Peter Laws
>> Cc: John Merrill ; RTTY Reflector
>> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Upside-down RTTY contest QSO's
>>
>> Somewhere along the way, in the past few months, I picked up the
>> impression
>> that one of the contest loggers had this exchange "style" as a default,
>> and
>> that that is why we are seeing it more.
>>
>> I know it isn't Writelog, but I don't know if it is or isn't N1MM+ or
>> something else. Maybe someone familiar with other loggers can look into
>> it.
>>
>> 73 jeff wk6i
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 12:20 PM, Peter Laws <plaws0 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 13, 2017 at 2:09 PM, John Merrill <johnn1jm at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > There are still some that do not send 599 when required by the rules.
>>> They seem to get confused when I REPLY RST? RST?.
>>>
>>> Yeah ... we need to work on sponsors to ditch that.  Put in something
>>> else.  Shoe size or something.  BARTG is half-way there.  :-)
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train!
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> RTTY mailing list
>>> RTTY at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> --
>
> 73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>



-- 
Jeff Stai ~ wk6i.jeff at gmail.com
Twisted Oak Winery ~ http://www.twistedoak.com/
Facebook ~ http://www.facebook.com/twistedoak