[SCCC] Intentional QRM
Tom Rauch
w8ji at contesting.com
Mon Jan 14 10:38:41 EST 2008
I agree piles can be rude and seem to be getting worse. I
worked a CU1 a week ago but someone spotted him as a 5B or
something. Then for the next two hours people kept working
CU1CB and saying things like "tnx nr 200 5B1xx". The CU1 was
giving his call, but so many people were calling that
couldn't hear him that most people thought it was the
callsign that was wrongly spotted. But that was simplex, and
there will always be people that can't really hear the DX
making cluster QSO's and bragging about them.
I'm puzzled by this thread, because the J5 is doing things
right. He is using a wide split....
>> Last night I had to work J5C 3 times to think I had one
>> QSO. Not because
>> I couldn't hear him. I just happened to choose a great
>> freq where he
>> could hear my call. So could the lids. All the lids and
>> kids were
>> calling on my freq while I tried to complete the QSO.
>> And I never did
>> get a firm confirmation of contact, so had to work him
>> again today.
When a DX station is operating with a reasonable split, say
over 2 kHz to keep out of the clicks, how can a station
calling on the split frequency cause anyone to be unsure of
the contact? I don't understand that. While I agree people
need to NOT call when they can't hear and to limit the
calling to a reasonable and proper time, it seems to me
unless someone is calling on top of the DX what people up
the band do would never affect my knowing if I made a good
QSO.
So what was the real cause of being unsure of the QSO????
Something doesn't make sense. Perhaps the REAL problem is
the J5 is not properly confirming the QSO in his response??
73 Tom
More information about the SCCC
mailing list