[SCCC] N6WIN 2012 ARRL FD 1E LP
Marty Woll
n6vi at socal.rr.com
Mon Jul 9 20:24:26 PDT 2012
Hi, Dino.
It's probably moot anyway, because I have never been able to get rule wording changes enacted before (although I will keep trying). However, I had that wording in the suggested language to prevent one licensed op lining up ten unlicensed people in front of ten rigs and pretending to be the control op for them all. HQ actually had a case in which four operators entered as 20A; the rules at the time did not explicitly prohibit the practice.
Thanks and 73,
Marty N6VI
----- Original Message -----
From: Dino Darling
To: Marty Woll ; sccc at contesting.com
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 7:45 PM
Subject: RE: [SCCC] N6WIN 2012 ARRL FD 1E LP
Field Day allows for un-licensed operators operating under a control
operator (that's a lot of "O's"). I'd drop "appropriately licensed
operator."
For further discussion, there is a limit on the number of transmitters
(transceivers?) operating on one band-mode at a time...
"4. Entry Categories: Field Day entries are classified according to the
maximum number of simultaneously
transmitted signals...
6. Miscellaneous Rules:
6.3. Phone, CW and Digital (non-CW) modes on a band are considered as
separate bands. A station may
be worked only once per band under this rule.
6.7. The use of more than one transmitter at the same time on a single
band-mode is prohibited. Exception:
a dedicated GOTA station may operate as prescribed in Rule 4.1."
The key words here are "SIMULTANEOUSLY" and "AT THE SAME TIME". While
the rules clearly state TRANSMITTING radios in rule #4, using two radios
on a single band-mode AT THE SAME TIME (one TX and one RX) is open for
interpretation. The rules say NO. Of course, they do say "transmitter"
in 6.7. Is it only a transmitter when transmitting and a receiver when
receiving...or do they mean "transceiver"?
Again, my initial reaction was that a lock-out was not allowed. As I
read the rules, I was right; but now I'm not sure.
Dino - KX6D
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [SCCC] N6WIN 2012 ARRL FD 1E LP
From: "Marty Woll" <n6vi at socal.rr.com>
Date: Mon, July 09, 2012 12:10 pm
To: "Michael Tope" <W4EF at dellroy.com>, <sccc at contesting.com>
Thanks, Mike.
Here's the wording I'd like to see (assuming that is the actual intent
of the rules):
"Devices that allow one operator to key multiple transmitters
simultaneously are not permitted. Each claimed transmitter in an entry
category must be manned by a separate, appropriately licensed operator."
73,
Marty N6VI
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Tope
To: sccc at contesting.com
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 11:30 AM
Subject: Re: [SCCC] N6WIN 2012 ARRL FD 1E LP
I've heard through the grapevine, for example, that some serious 1A
entries use SO2R setups to increase rate, which is fine if allowed by
the rules. From what you say, Marty, it sounds like that is the case.
The current wording doesn't really make that very clear. In fact, it
seems to imply that an SO2R setup with lockout would be prohibited, so
it would be good to get a more concise wording.
Thanks for chasing this down.
73, Mike W4EF
_______________________________________________
SCCC mailing list
SCCC at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sccc
More information about the SCCC
mailing list