[SCCC] Santa Barbara antenna restrictions

[Dennis Vernacchia]

However Reasonably Accommodate is very vague

Like I said - Toothless dog

On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 7:41 PM Dr. Howard S. White <drpaper at kleega.com>
wrote:

> As usual Dennis does not know what he is talking about.
>
> I have been through the City/Antenna Battles in San Diego and won.
>
> PRB1 and the California Version do have legal basis and can be used.
> While you have a legal basis, attitudes towards antennas do vary greatly
> between cities
> Some such as San Diego and Poway have become  very accommodating NOW
> Some are hostile
>
>
> Ultimately the city can't reject the antenna tower outright but rather
> they must "Reasonably Accommodate YOUR NEEDS"
> However Reasonably Accommodate is very vague so if a City digs in its
> heels you must be prepared to fight them
> Which unfortunately get be very expensive.
> From my experience if you show the City that you will continue the fight
> and never back down, you will win
> If not, you will lose.
>
>
> Sorry I don't have experience with Santa Barbara
> __________________________________________________________
> Howard S. White Ph.D. P. Eng., VE3GFW/K6  ex-AE6SM  KY6LA
> Website: www.ky6la.com
> "No Good Deed Goes Unpunished"
> "Ham Antennas Save Lives - Katrina, 2003 & 2007 San Diego Fires, 911"
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SCCC [mailto:sccc-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Dennis
> Vernacchia
> Sent: Monday, April 13, 2020 7:27 PM
> To: w6rw
> Cc: sccc at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [SCCC] Santa Barbara antenna restrictions
>
> PRB1 is a toothless ineffective dog and hoax perpetuated by the ARRL
>
> If you want to be screwed out of 10 grand - hire Hopgarten
>
> N6KI
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 11:03 AM w6rw <w6rw at earthlink.net> wrote:
>
> > Califirnia has integrated PRB1 into California state law. I dont know
> much
> > about Santa Barbara but do know that most cities pat morr attention to
> > California state law than they used to with PRB1Sent from my Verizon,
> > Samsung Galaxy smartphone
> > -------- Original message --------From: Clayton Nall <
> > clayton.nall at gmail.com> Date: 4/13/20  7:07 AM  (GMT-07:00) To:
> > sccc at contesting.com Subject: [SCCC] Santa Barbara antenna restrictions I
> > just moved to the SCCC zone and was wondering if any club members
> > hadexperience putting up antennas in the City of Santa Barbara or
> > couldrecommend someone local I should talk to about this.  I know Fred
> > K1VRpersonally from my days in MA but hoped to collect some local info
> > firstbefore giving him billable hours....😀I live in on a 50x150’ lot in
> an
> > older neighborhood with no HOA (!) and washoping to put up verticals or a
> > mast for dipoles on my flat second storyroof.  If the local building code
> > permits more than this, I hope to put upa small beam at some point.Any
> > recommendations would be appreciated.73ClayNF1R-- Clayton
> > Nallhttp://www.nallresearch.comWork: (650) 725-4076Cell: (617)
> > 850-2062_______________________________________________SCCC mailing
> > listSCCC at contesting.comhttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sccc
> > _______________________________________________
> > SCCC mailing list
> > SCCC at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sccc
> >
> _______________________________________________
> SCCC mailing list
> SCCC at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/sccc
>