[TenTec] Orion II A9 Board Failure...Again!
pfizenmayer
pfizenmayer at qwest.net
Thu Jun 26 16:18:40 EDT 2008
The TenTec capacitors in my O 565 and O 566 were NOT Chinese made - nor were
any others of which I am aware (about 5 other Orions) - they were made by
Illinois Capacitor - the capacitors were of good quality - just not selected
properly and being run considerably over the ripple ratings. I do not know
what current production is -
Hank K7HP
----- Original Message -----
From: "Speer, Doug" <Doug.Speer at FairbanksMorse.com>
To: <tentec at contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II A9 Board Failure...Again!
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:08:49 +0300
> From: "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <gsm at mendelson.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II A9 Board Failure...Again!
> To: geraldj at storm.weather.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> <tentec at contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <20080625160849.GA15020 at cable.mendelson.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> If the low quality Chinese electrolytic capacitors are a well known
> problem in the electronics industry, my question is has Ten-Tec done
> anything about it for late s/n production? I purchased a new Orion 2
> within the past couple of months which represents a significant
> expenditure for my ham radio hobby budget. I would hate to think I
> purchased anything less than top shelf quality. So maybe my question is
> one for Ten-Tec directly but has Ten-Tec procurement changed how they
> specify and buy components for production and / or service parts to
> insure they (we) are getting top quality components?
>
>
> Doug, W9PN
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:08:49 +0300
> From: "Geoffrey S. Mendelson" <gsm at mendelson.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Orion II A9 Board Failure...Again!
> To: geraldj at storm.weather.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> <tentec at contesting.com>
> Message-ID: <20080625160849.GA15020 at cable.mendelson.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 09:23:01AM -0600, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson wrote:
>> Lots of lowest bid Chinese electrolytics are poorer when new than I
> find
>> acceptable, so they age poorly. A few years ago there was a large
> batch
>> of capacitors often applied to computer motherboards that exploded
> when
>> power was applied for the first time. My guess is that the factory
>> didn't understand the formation process and hadn't finishing making
> the
>> electrolytics.
>
> This was very well documented in the press. A Tiwanese engineer worked
> for a Japanese manufacturer of electrolytics. He stole the formula for
> the electrolyte (the liquid inside the capacitors). His employers knew
> what he was doing and gave him access to an incomplete formula.
>
> It worked perfectly in new capacitors but as it aged the capacitors
> failed.
>
> His Tiawanese employers underbid everyone on the market and the world
> was flooded with products that eventually failed when their capacitors
> exploded.
>
> Geoff.
> --
> Geoffrey S. Mendelson, Jerusalem, Israel gsm at mendelson.com N3OWJ/4X1GM
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
> ----------Legal Disclaimer----------
>
> The information contained in this message may be privileged and
> confidential, and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee.
> No other person is authorized to access, copy or re-use this message (or
> any information contained herein). If you are not the intended recipient,
> please notify us immediately by replying to this message and delete it
> from your computer.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
>
More information about the TenTec
mailing list